Initiating and promoting the aquatic ecosystem health concept: the Society and the Journal

Since the 1970's the management of aquatic habitats has changed from piecemeal monitoring to the ecosystem approach; this was initiated in the North American Great Lakes, comprising social, economic, and environmental aspects. The information included in this paper is based on the presentation made at the Seminar On Ecosystem Approach To Water Management held in Oslo, Norway during 1991. Recently, the multidisciplinary, holistic, and integrated concept of ecosystem health has emerged, and is being advanced for the implementation of an ecosystem approach to environmental management, which has resulted in the formation of an international society (Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management Society) and the publication of a primary journal (Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Health). The information has been updated to incorporate new developments and recent progress about the Society and the journal since the Oslo Seminar.     

Trade-offs and synergies between ecosystem productivity and stability in temperate grasslands

Aim

It is crucial to monitor how the productivity of grasslands varies with its temporal stability for management of these ecosystems. However, identifying the direction of the productivity–stability relationship remains challenging because ecological stability has multiple components that can display neutral, positive or negative covariations. Furthermore, evidence suggests that the direction of the productivity–stability relationship depends on the biotic interactions and abiotic conditions that underlie ecosystem productivity and stability. We decipher the relationships between grassland productivity and two components of its stability in four habitat types with contrasting environments and flora.

Location

France.

Time period

2000–2020.

Major taxa

Grassland plant species.

Methods

We used c. 20,000 vegetation plots spread across French permanent grasslands and remotely sensed vegetation indices to quantify grassland productivity and temporal stability. We decomposed stability into constancy (i.e., temporal invariability) and resistance (i.e., maximum deviation from average) and deciphered the direct and indirect effects of abiotic (namely growing season length and nitrogen input) and biotic (namely plant taxonomic diversity, trait diversity and community-weighted mean traits) factors on productivity–stability relationships using structural equation models.

Results

We found a positive relationship between productivity and constancy and a negative relationship between productivity and resistance in all habitats. Abiotic factors had stronger effects on productivity and stability compared with biotic factors. A longer growing season enhanced grassland productivity and constancy. Nitrogen input had positive and negative effects on grassland productivity and resistance, respectively. Trait values affected the constancy and resistance of grassland more than taxonomic and trait diversity, with effects varying from one habitat to another. Productivity was not related to any biotic factor.

Main conclusions

Our findings reveal how vital it is to consider both the multiple components of stability and the interaction between environment and biodiversity to gain an understanding of the relationships between productivity and stability in real-world ecosystems, which is a crucial step for sustainable grassland management.     

From aquatic science to ecosystem health: a philosophical perspective

The development of an ecosystem (social, economic, environmental) approach to water management is traced from its origins in the Great Lakes of North America. The focus on health and integrity of ecosystems is an outgrowth of the Lamarckian concept of The Biosphere as a global system of matter, life, and mind. The driving forces behind the development of an ecosystem approach have been negative feedback from excessive demotechnic growth and faith that we can maintain a healthy relationship with Mother Earth.     

Determining desirable levels of ecosystem services per capita

Ecosystem services are the numerous, essential processes that natural ecosystems provide free to human societies. Examples include the maintenance of breathable air; the movement, storage, and purification of water; the breakdown of wastes; and the provision of food, building materials, and medicines. However, the exponential increases in human population and concomitant environmental destruction make it likely that the level of ecosystem services available per capita will decline. There are three possible scenarios. First, if present practices continue, ecosystem services per capita will surely decline. Second, if a no-net-loss policy is implemented for habitats and species, ecosystem services per capita will still decline due to increases in human population, but the declines will be less precipitous. Third, if habitat is restored (including concomitant ecosystem services) at a rate exceeding that of destruction, then, perhaps the current level of ecosystem services per capita can be maintained, or even expanded to provide increased levels of ecosystem services per capita to more of the world's people.     

珠三角城市群区域生态系统服务供需均衡关系

生态系统服务供需均衡关系分析为生态系统管理提供了详实的科学基础信息。基于土地利用、气象和社会经济等多源数据,采用遥感反演、水量平衡方程、修正的通用土壤流失方程和植被净生产力模型(CASA)等方法,分别评估了1990—2015年珠三角城市群粮食供给、产水服务、固碳释氧和土壤保持服务;采用相关社会经济指标核算了生态系统服务的需求量;进而揭示了栅格、县域和市域多尺度的生态系统服务供需均衡关系及其时空演变特征。研究发现：(1)除粮食供给外,产水服务、固碳释氧和土壤保持服务呈波动性增加的趋势,增幅分别为52.2%、21.8%和73.4%;在空间上表现为中部平原地区服务水平低,低山丘陵地带高的分布特征。(2)除土壤保持服务外,粮食供给、产水服务和固碳释氧服务需求量不断增加,增幅分别为10.1%、17.5%和769.4%;中部平原地区生态系统服务需求量大,低山丘陵地带小。(3)除土壤保持和产水服务外,粮食供给、固碳释氧及综合服务供需指数不断下降,其中,2015年粮食供给和固碳释氧供需指数分别为-0.47和-0.71。研究结果可为决策者了解区域的生态系统服务供需均衡匹配状况提供科学基础信息,直接服务并...     

基于土地利用变化与生态系统服务供需的中国野生亚洲象时空迁移特征分析

2021年4月,我国15头野生亚洲象(Elephas maximus)从西双版纳一路北迁至昆明市受到了全世界的关注,分析我国野生亚洲象分布区土地利用变化、生态系统服务供需关系如何影响野生亚洲象分布,对保护亚洲象与提高当地人类福祉具有重要的意义。利用生态系统服务价值当量因子法和生态系统服务需求模型计算中国野生亚洲象分布区1990、2005、2015年生态系统服务供给价值与需求指数,通过空间标准化匹配出四种生态系统服务供需模式,探究我国野生亚洲象偏好分布的供需模式。结果表明,林地、草地和耕地是最主要的土地利用类型,1990—2015年,林地、草地和耕地的面积变化率分别为1.09%、-4.82%、-4.86%。1990、2005、2015年生态系统供给总价值分别为6108.55亿元、7434.41亿元、13973.37亿元;生态系统服务需求不断提高,整体呈现中间高,四周低的分布格局。在研究的25年内,亚洲象分布于高供给-高需求与高供给-低需求区域,且有向高供给-高需求区域迁徙的趋势。     

韧性城市研究综述——基于城市复杂系统视角

在全球气候变化与持续城市化的背景下,增强城市韧性是提升城市应急管理能力,实现城市系统可持续发展的重要途径。明确城市韧性的内涵、核心要素及相互作用机理,开展城市系统韧性测度与城市系统模拟,对提升变化环境下城市系统恢复力与韧性水平,缓解变化环境对城市系统运行稳定性冲击压力具有重要意义。基于文献与资料分析,全面解析韧性城市核心概念与各国韧性城市建设、管理与研究实践。此外,研究从城市复杂系统视角探究变化环境对城市系统影响机制、测度方法与系统模拟路径。研究为韧性城市理论、方法与实证研究提供了参考,并为我国韧性城市建设实践提供决策依据与政策建议。     

低碳发展背景下北京市土地利用与生态系统服务多情景模拟研究

在全球气候变化的背景下,合理协调低碳减排与经济效益之间的关系,进而指导土地利用优化配置,对于推动经济社会低碳转型与生态系统服务价值的提升具有重要意义。通过耦合多目标规划(MOP)与斑块生成土地利用模拟模型(PLUS),针对北京市构建了自然演变、经济优先与低碳发展这3种未来发展情景,并对不同情景下2030年土地利用与生态系统服务价值进行模拟评估。在此基础上,进一步对北京市未来生态系统服务提升区域进行识别,将传统的多情景土地利用模拟研究进行了延伸与扩展。结果表明：(1)3种情景下的土地利用结构与空间布局存在差异,低碳发展情景下东南部平原区建设用地的扩张与耕地面积的减少趋势得到了有效控制,西北部山区的林地面积有较大幅度的增长。(2)低碳发展情景下的生态系统服务价值总量约为590亿元,高于另外两种情景,且从空间分布上来看,该情景下服务价值提升区域的面积也显著高于其他情景。(3)低碳发展情景下,北京市生态系统服务提升潜力较大的区域面积占比约7.98%、潜力中等区域的面积占比约26.57%,潜力较低区域的面积占比约65.45%。     

城市生态系统长期观测研究站及其主要任务

随着对城市人居环境质量高度关注,城市生态学越来越受到重视。城市生态系统长期观测研究站(简称城市生态站),作为能够跟踪和研究城市生态系统长期变化规律的一种研究手段,在国内外得到了较快发展。在分析国内外城市生态站的研究经验和实践过程基础上,提出了城市生态站的科学目标、研究内容和主要工作,特别就城市生态站的观测工作、模拟实验工作和社会服务的基本框架和工作内容进行了论述,可以作为城市生态站建设的设计思路。为我国新建和完善城市生态站工作提供重要指导作用。     

大连金普新区碳固持生态服务供需格局时空差异

碳固持服务供需匹配状况对于优化区域生态系统管理、提升生态系统碳汇能力具有重要意义。以大连金普新区为研究区,利用InVEST模型、ArcGIS模型,研究固碳项生态系统服务供需匹配及其变化特征。结果表明：(1)研究期内,2010年至2018年,碳固持服务供给总量呈现出U字型变化趋势;需求总量呈现出持续增长的变化趋势,表现为低等级需求量地区向高等级需求量地区不断转化;碳固持服务供需求不匹配,供需错配现象突出,总体上呈现出供不应求。(2)碳固持服务供需赤字缺口正持续扩大。赤字类型总面积有持续增加的趋势;盈余类型总面积表现为先增后减;供需相对平衡类型总面积不断缩减,朝着低供给高需求方向转变。(3)金普新区碳汇地面积持续缩减,2018年仅为564km²;碳源地面积大量增加,2018年达到1340km²。(4)提出了控制城镇碳需求增长,增加绿地,提高碳供给能力,消减赤字,维持供需能力基本平衡的对策。